Invitees:
-
Meirion Rushworth – Head of
Finance
-
Robert Green – Assistant Head of
Finance
-
Sally Ann Jenkins – Strategic Director
– Social Services
-
Mary Ryan – Head of Adult
Services
-
Natalie Poyner – Head of Children
Services
-
Caroline Ryan-Phillips – Head of Prevention
and Inclusion
-
Mandy Shide –
Service Manager
-
Rhianydd
Williams – Service Manager Integrated
Family Support
-
Sarah Morgan – Chief Education
Officer
-
Sarah Davies – Deputy Chief Education
Officer
The
Assistant Head of Finance introduced a brief overview of the budget
process.
New
Pressures and Investments
The
following was discussed:
-
The Committee enquired about the SEN Out of County and Local Provision pupil demand and
noted the increase of 4 places in both Sporting Chance and Catch 22
and asked for more information about this. The Chief Education
Officer (CEO) informed Committee that Budget demand for Education
is now being met by the Council and this looks at the need to
support children that might have to go out of county due to complex
needs. The CEO assured the Committee that work is being undertaken
to establish local provision where possible and the contracts with
current providers will be maintained as they provide around 30
places, but this will provide an additional 4 places if required.
The CEO informed Committee that if they aren’t used, it would
be considered an underspend in the
Budget, but the places are needed, and they are positive will be
utilised. There is consistent monitoring taking place around who
need places and what is available to us and when contracting
additional places Quality Assurance checks are carried out to
ensure pupils welfare and that the ratios of teacher to student are
correct.
-
The Committee enquired about the ALN Provision for
schools and noted that last year funding was to be confirmed and we
were unable to meeting ALN requirements and would like reassurance
that this investment will meet requirements. The CEO informed the
Committee that there has always been cost pressures around ALN
pupils and this has been identified more than ever before. The CEO
informed the Committee that due to more complexities with children
and people, this investment amount doesn’t mean it will
necessarily meet all needs however schools have responsibility with
wholistic budget to provide for all
children, so this investment is in addition to an individual school
budget. The CEO informed the Committee that they know the demand on
schools, and this won’t necessarily provide everything, but
it is one additional step to support those recognised challenges.
The Committee stated that it is a good thing that there is this
additional investment to support ALN students.
Domiciliary care support to be enhanced with assistive
technology to reduce the levels of care hours required.
-
The Committee enquired how assistive technology will
be used to help reduce the levels of care. The Head of Adult
Services informed Committee that they have already started to
implement this and there is a smart HUB exhibition in Newport
Market which demonstrates how this can be used for things like
automatic curtains, and communication with family. They informed
Committee that feedback from the public has been positive, but they
are ensuring that it is tailored to meet individual
needs.
-
The Committee enquired that if domiciliary care is
looking to be replaced in part by assistive technology that there
is an assumption of family support to carry out these checks in
place of the domiciliary care. The Head of Adult Services informed
the Committee that during the Pandemic there were more family
support which is not the case now but for unpaid carers this
assistive technology has been a lifeline. They assured Committee
that it will never replace the need for domiciliary care but is an
addition to it.
Fees and
Charges
-
The Committee enquired who pays fees and charges to
the Council. The Assistant Head of Finance informed the Committee
that the headings highlighted in green on the report show who pays
these fees and charges, the first set is other Local Authorities
and the second is Newport Residents. The charges are the same
amounts, but they differentiate between who is paying. The Head of
Adult Services informed the Committee that if there is a vacancy
that a neighbouring authority wishes to use, they get charged at
the same rate as Newport residents as it is means
tested.
-
The Committee queried the percentage increase of
Appointeeship by 102% and wanted to
know why it is such a large increase. The Assistant Head of Finance
informed the Committee that this is now reflective following a
thorough review and recosting exercise
of the service area that has taken place and in cash terms it is
not as significant an increase as other services even though the
percentage is high. The Head of Adult Services informed the
Committee that anyone who requires the Appointee services is
subject to a full financial assessment of their
circumstances.
The Chair thanked the
Officers for attending.